BTR-80 made for Spetsnaz

-

The greatest danger to an APC is the defeat of compartments where the crew sits and the loss of power diverted from the engine. As a result, the vehicle becomes a stationary target and is a 'grave' for the crew inside. Equally, important is the preservation of combat power, providing the APC with the firepower that in return affects its total combat potential. Damage to the undercarriage posed less danger to the vehicle due to its 8 wheel chassis and ability to retain mobility with blown-out wheels. 

The 8mm-10mm thick side armour of the BTR-80 could not hold direct hits from RPGs or close-by mine explosions. During the final large combat interactions in Chechnya in May of 1996, The Russian forces lost a large number of vehicles including BTRs that were mainly destroyed by RPGs.

This problem was approached with a 'head-on' solution, by attaching additional armour plates, steel screens or spaced armour, as was done by the Estonian Army before the collapse of the Soviet Union. This upgrade was very impractical, the vehicle has many weak zones that should have been covered, while utilizing armour plates with a minimal thickness of several millimetres, the weight of the vehicle would increase by 2.5-3 tons. Drastically reducing off-road capabilities, manoeuvrability and speed, which in result to would affect the vehicle's chance of survival.  

After noticing this flaw, it was decided to scrap the idea of mounting armour plates. Instead, it was decided to look into the idea of using ERA (Explosive Reactive Armour), which was already being mounted on several tank variants. Battalion Commander, Lieutenant Colonel Leonid Melnikov, who dealt with 'Dushman' (Soviet Army term for Afghan mujahideen) with RPGs in Afghanistan, approved the idea of mounting ERA on a BTR-80, however, setting a condition: "Do not break the machine!". 

The ERA bricks and their mounting brackets were obtained from an old decommissioned T-72. Mounting brackets were welded onto the hull of the BRT. 



The layout consisted of 34 containers and the placement was oriented around protecting internal modules and crew. Primarily covering the commander, driver and gunner operator in the turret. The majority of the containers were mounted with a significant amount of space from the main armour to prevent the armour from being damaged when the containers detonate and are also spaced out as to not block the portholes. 

Another 8 containers are mounted on the turret, 4 on each side and are spaced out to not block the 14.5mm KPVT. 


The layout consisted of 34 containers and the placement was oriented around protecting internal modules and crew. Primarily covering the commander, driver and gunner operator in the turret. The majority of the containers were mounted with a significant amount of space from the main armour to prevent the armour from being damaged when the containers detonate and are also spaced out as to not block the portholes. 

Another 8 containers are mounted on the turret, 4 on each side and are spaced out to not block the 14.5mm KPVT. 



The vehicle's hull was halfway protected with 10mm rubber screens taken from the same decommission T-72. These screens were mounted over the upper wheel arches; 1st and 2nd, 3rd and 4th wheel pairs, while the troop door in the centre of the hull was kept unprotected and easily accessible. 

This BTR variant attracted the attention of tank specialists. According to their advice, for additional protection, rather than using thin side armour during an explosive 'splash', a shielding layer of aluminium honeycombs should be utilized, which would crumple and absorb the energy of the shockwave. 

The modified BTR-80 retained its driving and manoeuvrability characteristics, confirming the effectiveness of the altered protection package in different testing exercises. Another improvement was on the crew. A 'psychological effect' took place due to the increased protection making the crew perform better. 

Taken from: Tankomaster No.4 1997

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BMP-3 with "Karkas-1"/"Karkas-2" ERA packages

-
Image
  Shown at an exhibition in Omsk in 2001. ERA  blocks are located on the side and frontal parts of the hull and turret together with rubber fabric and lattice screens.  Additional protection significantly increases the survivability of the BMP-3. Advertising information of those years stated that the BMP-3 with the "Karkas-1"/"Karkas-2" was capable of withstanding the impact of HEAT grenades (RPG) with armour penetration up to 550 mm.  Also, reactive armour blocks increase the armour's resistance to damage from bullets of 14.5 mm calibre. Only known image of a BMP-3M swimming with the additional armour package. Further topic on BMP-3 ERA package
Read more

BMP-3 ERA topic continuation

-
Image
This post expands on a previously covered topic, being the BMP-3 with ERA . Potentially sealing this topic until later when more information comes to light.  ERA package components:  ERA containers filled with 4S24 ERA elements, containers are mounted on the front and both sides of the hull. Slat armour mounted on the rear of the vehicle protects the engine compartment. Overall package performance:  Protection against AT rocket-propelled grenades (RPG) PG-7V, PG-7VS, PG-7VL, PG-7VM, PG-9S and other types of grenades capable of penetrating up to 600mm RHA within a 180 ° fire arc.  In areas covered by ERA containers, the probability of protection is at least 80%.  In areas covered by slat armour, the probability of protection is at least 50%. Protection against small arms:  Areas covered by ERA containers 12.7mm B-32 rounds at 0m within 180 ° fire arc 14.5mm B-32 rounds at 50 m within 180 ° fire arc Areas covered by slat armour and steel plates 12.7mm B-32 rounds at 35 0m within 180 ° fi
Read more

GTD-1000 - GTD-1000TF - GTD-1250 Gas Turbine Engines

-
Image
The world's first mass-produced tank gas turbine engine GTD-1000T was created at the Klimov Plant in 1968 for the T-80 main battle tank developed By the special tank design Bureau of the Kirov plant (now JSC "Spetsmash"), which was adopted by the Soviet Army in 1976. Since 1980, a modification of the GTD‑1000TF for T-80B/BV tanks was produced, since 1986 a modification of the GTD-1250 for T-80U tanks.  GTD-1250 Engines of the GTD-1250 family as part of the power plants of T-80 tanks are in service with the armies of Russia, Belarus, Cyprus, South Korea, Kazakhstan. Turbine engine GTD-1000T/GTD-1250, which have a large volume-weight  capacity and a more favourable traction characteristic compared to diesel engines, provide T-80 tanks with interesting characteristics: - higher operational readiness - easy start-up at low temperatures (up to -40°C) - better cross-country ability on soils with a low load-bearing capacity - best noise and heat-masking qualities - increased &qu
Read more